Skip to content

Conversation

@castelao
Copy link
Member

Baby steps on the correct direction. Increasing minimum coverage to 32.65%

Baby steps on right direction. Increasing minimum coverage to 32.65%
@castelao castelao self-assigned this Nov 13, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 13, 2025 20:32
@castelao castelao added the p-medium Priority: medium label Nov 13, 2025
@castelao castelao requested a review from ppinchuk as a code owner November 13, 2025 20:32
@castelao castelao added the topic-python-general Issues/pull requests related to python label Nov 13, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@ppinchuk ppinchuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine for now, but I'd recommend waiting to do this until we merge a bunch of those PR's. We have a backlog of open PR's that increase coverage, and I have like 3 more locally that I am waiting on that will increase coverage.

Plus, when we move to the plugin structure, I expect this number to go way up. So not to waste too much time on this, I'd recommend waiting until a lot of that work is done before increasing this value again

@ppinchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

Also I'm really glad for our locked test! It caught the pixi lock file being out of date with pyproject toml :)

@castelao castelao marked this pull request as draft November 13, 2025 20:36
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR incrementally increases the minimum code coverage threshold from 30% to 32.65% for Python unit and overall tests, representing gradual progress toward better test coverage.

  • Updated --cov-fail-under parameter from 30 to 32.65 for Python test commands
  • Integration tests maintain their separate threshold of 15%

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@castelao
Copy link
Member Author

@ppinchuk , shall we abort this PR and close it? Your codecov setup is doing much better than this.

@castelao
Copy link
Member Author

@ppinchuk , I'll close this one. I completely forgot this repo was public. Your codecov solution was much better.

@castelao castelao closed this Nov 17, 2025
@castelao castelao deleted the cov32 branch December 1, 2025 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

p-medium Priority: medium topic-python-general Issues/pull requests related to python

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants